Going into P3, I originally wanted to talk about a topic
regarding politics. This was an interest of mine because of the current
presidential debate but also just a general interest involving the subject. I
decided not to further my research in this topic because I believe it is a very
difficult subject to discuss and research while having absolutely no bias. This
pertains to both my own writing as well as finding scholarly articles that do
not lean to one side. I also was having a difficult time coming up with what my
research question would be, since I have never written a paper on politics. I
changed my topic of study to Greek life, specifically fraternity’s. I am
interested in this topic because I do not know a lot about it and I believe
that will help my writing as far as being as unbiased as possible. The topic of
Greek life is within our course work of Ethics in Higher Education but the texts
in EHE are more along the lines of sorority life, which honestly does not
interest me as much. Fraternities have more of an edge because of all of the
hazing rumors typical fraternities supposedly engage in. My research question
is “What are the positive/negative effects to joining a fraternity with in the
Greek Life culture?” I want to split my essay into talking about both the
negative and positive things regarding the subject. I believe that discussing
both the positive and negative sides of fraternity’s will help my essay be
unbiased. As for stakeholders, I think that potential Greek life recruits would
find more of an interest towards this topic because it would be a good chance
for them to have some research on what things they can get out of being in a
frat but also some of the things they could experience, both good and bad. The
argument in this research is partially by my own self, because I am including
both negative and positive things on the subject. Another stakeholder could be presidents
of campus’s because they have a large say on whether or not Greek Life should
be on their campus at all. It can also be a good opportunity for overbearing
parents to read this research paper, to see if they really want to pay for
their child to be involved with an association like this one. I think having
potential fraternity members be my stakeholder will be the best crowd because
these individuals encourage myself to have the least bias opinion. Potential fraternity members are also
important to remember because they are not necessarily associated yet, so they
still have an open mind on whether or not this is something they will get
involved with or not. This makes them an “unconvinced” stakeholder. My only
concerns at this point is finding reliable and relatable sources for my topic.
I believe that a personal interview will be a beneficial source for this
process. I have written research papers before so I am fairly comfortable with
looking for scholarly articles. I enjoy that P3 is centered around what we want to write about!
No comments:
Post a Comment